Many online proctoring solutions on the market set out to address the challenges of online test administration but fail to meet the diverse needs of students, educators, and institutions.
Proctoring software may offer advanced AI technology but lack human insight, resulting in bias and inaccuracy. It may offer great usability but violates the institution’s privacy policies. It may be highly scalable but is built on biased algorithms. With state-of-the-art technology, however, institutions don’t have to compromise. Our proctoring software comparison can show you how Rosalyn’s assessment experience meets all your needs.
Most institutions understand how online proctoring works on a basic level. What many don’t fully understand is that online proctoring software can come in many forms that provide vastly different exam experiences.
A recent EDUCAUSE QuickPoll of higher education institutions found that 80% were using more than one type of proctoring software, and 20% used all four methods of proctoring software on the market. These four include:
These methods are paired with live online proctoring, recorded online proctoring, advanced automated proctoring, or human-in-the-loop proctoring.
A proctor reviews live footage of test-takers in real time.
A proctor reviews recordings of students after the test is completed.
AI scans the test environment in real time and flags suspicious activity.
AI analyzes students during a live or recorded exam and flags suspicious activity. Flagged events are sent to a student advocate for review, either in real time or after the fact.
The EDUCAUSE poll shows that many institutions have serious concerns about the online proctoring software they are currently using, including cost, privacy protection, and the ability to meet accessibility standards. However, using multiple solutions to meet the needs of students, educators, and institutions results in an expensive and ineffective way to conduct exams. With this student assessment experience and online proctoring software comparison, you can find a better way.
Pro: Active video surveillance can approximate a classroom setting by allowing proctors to monitor multiple students at once in real time.
Con: Live proctoring requires a large number of proctors across an institution, exams must be scheduled based on proctor availability, and proctors must monitor students continuously throughout the exam, making this a costly and inconvenient option. Proctors may also miss potential infractions, compromising the results of the exam.
Pro: Passive video surveillance allows proctors to review exam footage at a later date, minimizing scheduling challenges.
Con: Proctors must review all footage, which can be costly and time-consuming, offers limited scalability, and introduces the risk of proctor fatigue. If a student experiences problems with the software, they may have no ability to notify proctors in real time, potentially affecting their results or ability to take the test.
Pro: AI technology provides great scalability, reduces costs, and minimizes scheduling challenges by eliminating the need for human proctors.
Con: Flawed AI technology presents significant problems. Poor facial recognition software has been known to discriminate against students of color, students with disabilities, and students of certain cultural backgrounds. Subpar and overly sensitive AI may flag benign movements and sounds as exam violations, and students may have little recourse. Furthermore, AI-based online proctoring software has prompted serious ethical and legal questions about student privacy and data protection.
Pro: Human-in-the-loop (HITL) student assessment software eliminates many of the problems associated with automated solutions by pairing AI with human insight. Flagged events are evaluated by human proctors to ensure accuracy. This event-based system is highly efficient and minimizes the number of human proctors needed, making it a scalable, cost-effective, and convenient option.
Con: Real-time HITL assessment requires scheduling according to proctor availability.
When selecting online proctoring software, a comparison of all features is essential. Rosalyn was designed to include everything you need to create superior exam experiences for students, educators, and institutions alike.Get A Demo